Using AI for homeschool

The implosion of public school during COVID created a whole new batch of homeschooling families. While this is great news, it also means more than a few families are discovering the difficulty in homeschooling children, especially when the child has difficulty in subjects the parents aren’t familiar with.

That’s why I encourage all homeschooling parents to use AI. I use CoPilot since its free, but you’re welcome to use OpenAI or any other AI. Now, we aren’t going to try and look up gender studies or DEI subjects, because parents should talk with their children about those topics. But what about math?

Let’s be honest, unless you happen to work in engineering, integrating a function is likely something you haven’t done recently. AI makes this really easy AND it explains the work.

Remember diagramming sentences? I don’t because I’m sure I slept through that portion of school. So what do you do when your kid is confused about diagramming sentences?

Problem solved! But what about foreign languages?

Too bad for CoPilot! You have to have a Microsoft account of some kind to make this work

If it can diagram sentences, it can definitely update your work too!

What about chemistry? Balancing redux equations in high school chemistry is something I haven’t touched in years.

Another great use of AI is technical help. If something doesn’t work correctly on your computer, AI makes it easy to troubleshoot. I had a lot of problems getting rid of the kid’s google accounts from my wife’s laptop. I would go to a website and their account, vice my wife’s, would load and be heavily restricted. AI helped me solve that problem.

Another great school use is Excel functions. Microsoft Excel is extremely powerful, much more so than Google Sheets, but the syntax and formatting can get messy quickly. CoPilot is especially good at taking what you want to do and spitting out a function you can copy/paste. Even something complicated like pivot tables falls to the power of AI!

I think Microsoft captured AI, especially large language learning models, with the phrase “CoPilot.” Yes, AI can generate some pretty humorous poems and the occasional rap song, plus create some very cool images, but human beings are still far better at imagining unique things. Where AI shines is rote work. How many times have you Googled different Excel formulas, or how to integrate a function, or where some setting is in PowerPoint? My kids have tons of weird questions that pop up, ranging from English and Math to Biology and Chemistry. Anything that is straightforward will easily be answered with AI.

One caution: I always encourage people to have a discussion with the AI. Just popping in a question and getting an answer is dangerous, because the AI, like human beings, can get it wrong. This happened on an English question my daughter had. The first answer didn’t make sense, and she was ready to write off AI. I had her put in a few more prompts, and then the AI (in this case, CoPilot) gave her the correct answer. Treat it like a really smart human and you’ll do great!

This post represents the views of the author and not those of the Department of Defense, Department of the Navy, or any other government agency. And besides the pictures, nothing else in this post was generated by AI.

DEI makes for dumb PCs

One of the biggest concerns for a Chinese invasion of Taiwan is the loss of TSMC, a huge company that makes around 80% of the world’s advanced microprocessors and chipsets and 55% of chips overall. Think about that for just one second…55% of all chips in the entire world are made by one company. In your home alone, there are chips in your computer, cars, certain HVAC components, smartphones, your wifi router, TVs, and even things like refrigerators. 55% of these chips come from one company.

That’s pretty crazy when you think about it. TSMC has facilities around the world, although the majority are located in Taiwan. Why wouldn’t it open more facilities in the US? Well, because its expensive due to all the red tape involved in making facilities in the US and because there is not enough talent in the US to make chips. If we drop the nice language, TSMC has basically said it costs too much and Americans aren’t smart enough to make these advanced chips.

Ouch. So much for all that STEM money we keep throwing at education that gets misused. Since chips are key components of most weapon systems, Congress passed the CHIPS act to subsidize and incentivize chip manufacturers in America. But guess what came along with the money? A whole lot of strings, including DEI strings:

The law contains 19 sections aimed at helping minority groups, including one creating a Chief Diversity Officer at the National Science Foundation, and several prioritizing scientific cooperation with what it calls “minority-serving institutions.” A section called “Opportunity and Inclusion” instructs the Department of Commerce to work with minority-owned businesses and make sure chipmakers “increase the participation of economically disadvantaged individuals in the semiconductor workforce.”

– The Hill

This is exactly why China and other nations can beat us at these high-end games. Americans are known for working hard and figuring things out, and until recently the advanced nature of American colleges and other education institutions was known around the world. But we’ve allowed morons (and if you support DEI, you are a moron) to write our laws and corrupt our institutions. The steady rise in costs from these morons has driven everyone away, from chip manufacturers and oil and gas production to basic tools and batteries.

We did this to ourselves. We can undo it too. Imagine a world without stupid bureaucrats running everything into the dirt. Imagine the US unleashing its potential and the hard work and smarts actually paying off, not being stifled by people insisting on laws and incentives that make no sense in the real world. A far better world, and one within our reach, if we choose to make it so.

This post represents the views of the author and not those of the Department of Defense, Department of the Navy, or any other government agency.

1972 Dynasty League Waivers List

These are the players available in Waivers by position

  • 1B
  • Jim Beauchamp NYM
  • Pat Bourque Cubs
  • Jim Breazeale Atl Claimed on Waivers by Pit
  • Bob Burda Bos
  • Gail Hopkins KC
  • Paul Jata Det
  • Pete Koegel Phil
  • Terry McDermott LAD
  • Tony Muser White Sox claimed NYY May 8th
  • Art Shamsky Oak

2B

  • Lute Barnes NYM
  • Ken Boswell NYM Claim Montreal Week 2 Early Waivers
  • Larry Brown Oak
  • Denny Doyle Phil Claim Early Waivers week 5 cubs
  • Bobby Fenwick Hou
  • Rod Gilbreath Atl
  • Jim Lefebvre LAD
  • Bill Mazeroski Pit Claimed Yankees Successful
  • Len Randle Tex Claim Montreal Week 2 Early Waivers
  • Fred Stanley SD
  • Hector Torres Mon Claimed week 4 Early waivers Boston
  • Jim Wohlford KC

3B

  • Hank Allen ChW
  • Billy Grabarkewitz LAD
  • Dave Hilton SD
  • Julian Javier Cin
  • Dalton Jones Tex
  • Rich McKinney NYY
  • Syd O’Brien Mil
  • Jose Pagan Pit Claimed Pittsburgh Claim Successful
  • Billy Parker Cal

SS

  • Luis Alvarado ChW
  • Juan Beniquez Bos Claimed Pittsburgh successful
  • Lou Camilli Cle
  • Jack Heidemann Cle
  • Rudy Hernandez ChW
  • Marty Martinez Tex
  • Rafael Robles SD

Catcher

  • Chuck Brinkman Chw
  • Paul Casanova Atl Claimed Atlanta successful
  • Vic Correll Bos
  • Rick Dempsey Min Claim NYY
  • Bob Didier Atl Waivers claim Pit 6/28 WASHINGTON COUNTERCLAIM 6/29 Cubs Counter Washington 6/29 Cubs Counter-counter Claim Successful
  • Tom Egan Chw
  • Frank Fernandez Cubs
  • Russ Gibson SF
  • Joe Goddard SD
  • Tom Haller Det Claimed Pittsburgh Waivers successful
  • Larry Howard Hou Claimed Cleveland Week 3 early waivers
  • Cliff Johnson Hou
  • Larry Johnson Cle
  • Art Kusnyer Cal
  • J.C. Martin Cubs
  • Jerry May KC
  • Joe Nolan NYM
  • Dennis Paepke KC
  • Paul Ratliff Mil
  • Ken Rudolph Cubs
  • Bob Stinson Hou
  • Carl Taylor KC Claimed Cleveland Early waivers week 3

LF

  • Kurt Bevacqua Cle
  • Chris Coletta Cal
  • Tommy Davis Bal Claim Pit
  • Jim Fairey Mon
  • Phil Gagliano Bos
  • Joe Keough KC
  • Charlie Manuel Min
  • Curt Motton Cal
  • Rick Renick Min
  • Tommie Reynolds Mil
  • Tom Shopay Bal
  • Bernie Williams SF Taken Early Waiver Week 3 Boston

CF

  • Boots Day Mont
  • Jay Johnstone Chw Claimed waivers NYY 6/24
  • Jim Lyttle Chw
  • Jim Nettles Min
  • Lee Richard Chw
  • Jorge Roque StL

RF

  • Brant Alyea StL
  • Mike Anderson Phil waivers claim 6/28 Milwaukee successful
  • Byron Browne Phil
  • Randy Elliott SD
  • Roy Foster Cle
  • Don Hahn NYM
  • Gene Hiser Cubs
  • Ron Lolich Cle
  • Dave Marshall NYM
  • Norm Miller Hou Claimed Boston Waivers successful
  • Dave Schneck NYM Claimed California Waivers successful
  • Larry Stahl SD Claimed Pit Waivers Successful!
  • Ron Stone Phil
  • Ted Uhlaender Cin
  • Bill Voss StL

Pitcher

  • Wade Blasingame NYY
  • Les Cain Det Claimed early waivers week 4 SF Giants
  • Tony Cloninger
  • John Cumberland StL Claimed Waivers Boston
  • Jimmy Freeman Atl
  • Bob Gebhard Min
  • Jim Geddes Chw
  • Joe Gilbert Mon
  • Joe Grzenda StL CLAIM Waivers week 5 Washington Successful!
  • Steve Hargan Cle Claimed early waiver week 5 Cubs
  • Rich Hinton Tex Claimed early waivers week 4 SF Giants
  • Ron Klimkowski NYY
  • Lew Krausse Bos
  • Denny Lemaster Mon
  • Denny McLain Atl Claimed on waivers by Baltimore
  • Pete Mikkelsen Claimed early Waivers week 5 Cleveland
  • Jim Nash Phil Claimed by Baltimore successful
  • Gary Neibauer Phil
  • Mel Queen Cal
  • Bob RAuch NYM Claimed Cubs 6/24
  • Phil Regan Chw
  • Archie Reynolds Mil
  • Jim Roland Tex
  • Mark Schaeffer SD Claimed Cleveland early waivers week 1
  • Dick Selma Phil Claimed Kansas City waivers successful
  • Steve Simpson SD
  • Hank Webb NYM Claimed Boston Early Waivers week 3

1972 league full draft (backup copy)

Keeping a copy of the draft for the 1972 league here on the backup blog as a backup copy for quick reference:

Round 1 & 2

Pick # TeamPlayerPositionPick #TeamPlayerPosition
1MontrealLou Brock OF1MontrealWillie MaysOF
2PittsburghHank Aaron1B2PittsburghBill RussellSS
3CincinnatiRon Santo3B3CincinnatiBill LeeP
4San FranciscoDarryl Evans3B4.SF Dave Cash2B
5St. LouisDon KessingerSS5StLDarold KnowlesP
6New York (Y)Reggie Smith RF6New York (Al)Danny ThompsonSS
7ClevelandJohn MatlackP7ClevelandBill StonehamP
8MinnesotaAl OliverOF8MinnesotaBob WatsonOF
9MilwaukeeDoug Rader3B9MilwaukeeEarl WilliamsC
10BostonGary NolanP10BostonHorace Clarke2B
11PhiladelphiaRudy MayP11PhiladelphiaTed AbernaphyP
12WashingtonMike Epstein1B12Washington SenatorsReggie ClevelandP
13CaliforniaDon Money3B13CaliforniaDave ConcepecionSS
14AtlantaRollie FingersP14AtlantaAurelio Rodriguez3B
15OaklandRoy WhiteLF15OaklandTed Sizemore2B
16Mil (Via NYM)Don Wilson P16New York (NL)Jerry ReussP
17Chicago (N)Jeff BurroughsOF17CubsLou PinellaOF
18Mil (Via Balt)Blue Moon OdomP18 NYY (via balt)Dave Nelson3B
19Kansas CityClyde WrightP19Kansas CityNelson BrilesP
20Los AngelesWayne TwitchellP20Los AngelesSteve RenkoP

Round 3 & 4

Pick # TeamPlayerPositionPick #TeamPlayerPosition
1MontrealCarlos MayOF1MontrealEd Kirpatrickc
2PittsburghJim Barr P2PittsburghJose Cruzcf
3Cincinnati Al Kaline OF3CincinnatiMike CaldwellP
4San FranciscoEllie Rodriguezc4San FranciscoRick MondayOF
5Boston (Via StL)Bud HarrelsonSSSt LouisBob VealeP
6New York (A)Lindsy McDanielPNew York (A)Sklp LockwoodP
7ClevelandBill HandP7ClevelandWayne Garrett3B
8MinnesotaTito Fuentes2B8MinnesotaRay FossieC
9MilwaukeeEd BrinkmanSS9MilwaukeeCaesar Geronimoof
10New York (N) (via Bos)Ken HendersonOF10StL (via BostonMatty AlouOF
11PhiladelphiaSteve Arlin P11PhiladelphiaPaul LimbladP
12WashingtonTim Foliss12WashingtonEd HermanC
13CaliforniaManny MotaOF13CaliforniaBobby Valentine2B
14AtlantaToby HarrahSS14AtlantaSandy Alomar2B
15OaklandBoog Powel1B15OaklandLynn McGlothenP
16New York (N)Leron LeeOF16San Fran (via NY)Eddie WattP
17Chicago (N)Steve Braun3B17Chicago (N)Jose OrtaSS
18Mil (via Balt)Frank RobinsonOF18SF (via Balt)Tommie Ageecf
19KCduffy Dyerc19KCNorm Cash1B
20Los AngelesDave Roberts P20Los AngelesMike LumOF

Round 5 & 6 NOTE ALL TRADING ENDS WHEN ROUND 6 Begins

Pick # TeamPlayerPositionPick #TeamPlayerPosition
1Montreal Frank DuffySS1MontrealRon Theobald2B
2PittsburghGray Ross P2PittsburghBob JohnsonP
3Cincinnati Paul Splittorff P3CincinnatiLuis Aparicioss
4San FranciscoCy AcostaP4San FranciscoTommy Harper OF
5St LouisBob Oliver1B5StLDick McAuliffe2B
6NYYJim McGlothlinP6NYYGene TenaceC
7ClevelandJim HickmanOF7ClevelandDave RaderC
8MinnesotaJohn BoccabellaC8MinnesotaDave LaRocheP
9MilwaukeeMike Jorgenson1B9MilwaukeeRay LambP
10BostonVada PinsonOF10BostonTom timmermanP
11PhiladelphiaChuck SeelbachP11PhiladelphiaElliott madduxof
12WashingtonCarl MortonP12WashingtonAndy EtchebarrenC
13CaliforniaJerry MoralesCF13CaliforniaTommy McCraw1B
14AtlantaDick BillingsC14AtlantaSonny SiebertP
15OaklandDennis Menkie3B15OaklandSteve DunningP
16Kansas City (via mets)Bob LockerP16 NY metsLeo CardenesSS
17chicago (N)John HillerP17CubsRich GossageP
18Mil (via balt)Darryl Porterc18BaltimoreGlenn Becket2B
19Mil (via KCGene Michaelss19Mil (via KC)Tom KelleyP
20Los AngelesBill Sudsakis1b20Los AngelesMerv Rettenmundof

Round 7 & 8

Pick # TeamPlayerPositionPick #TeamPlayerPosition
1Montreal Jim FregosiSS1MontrealChris Chamblis1B
2PittsburghSteve Barber P2Pittsburghelrod Hendricksc
3Cincinnati Jim Ray Hart 3B3CincinnatiJerry GroteC
4San FranciscoJohn StrohmeyerP4San FranciscoTony TaylorInf
5St LouisDon McMahonP5St LouisPete BrobergP
6New York (AL)Jerry JohnsonP6New York (AL)Mark BelangerSS
7ClevelandRon ReedP7ClevelandTom GriffinP
8MinnesotaCito GastonOF8MinnesotaMike KekichP
9MilwaukeeJohnny Edwardsc9MilwaukeeBob HeiseInf
10BostonJoe HorlenP10 BostonStaeve KealyP
11PhiladelphiaLarvell BlanksUtl11PhiladelphiaPete RichertP
12Mil (via Wash)Ken SandersP12WashingtonRick Reichartof
13CaliforniaBill Faheyc13CaliforniaJim RookerP
14AtlantaTed FordP14AtlantaEd Krainpool1b
15OaklandChris ZacheryP15OaklandMike corkinsP
16KC (via mets)Bob Bailey 3B16New York (N)Dave LemondsP
17Chicago (N)John MilnerOF17Chicago (N)Mickey Stanleycf
18BaltimoreJuan MarichallP18BaltimoreBill ParsonsP
19Mil (via KC)Denny RiddlebergerP19Kansas CityJoe DeckerP
20Los AngelesGrant JacksonP20Los AngelesDiego SeguiP

Round 9 & 10

Pick # TeamPlayerPositionPick #TeamPlayerPosition
1Montreal Bobby BrolinP1MontrealRon Hansen3B
2PittsburghRon Woods OF2PittsburghGary PetersP
3Cincinnati Ted Martinez 2B3CincinnatiBuckey BrandonP
4San FranciscoTerry Harmon2B4San FranciscoMaury WillsSS
5St LouisBill GogolewskiP
6New York (AL)ShellenbachP5New York (AL)Deron Johnson1B
7ClevelandBill SlaybackP6ClevelandGene AlleySS
8MinnesotaAngel Mangualof7MinnesotaDerryl Thomas2B
9MilwaukeeJack HiattC8 MilwaukeeJim SlantonP
10BostonDick DietzC9BostonKen BrettP
11 PhiladelphiaAndy KoscoOF10PhiladelphiaDeron JOhnson1B
12WashingtonVicente RomoP11WashingtonEddie FisherP
13CaliforniaJack AkerP12CaliforniaBob Robinson1B
13AtlantaCarmen Fanzone3B13AtlantaMonty MontgomeryP
14OaklandHoracio PinaP14OaklandDarrell Chaney SS
15New York (NL)lerrin LagrowP15New York (NL)Al SantoriniP
16Chicago (NL)Garry Jestdadt2B16Chicago (NL)Danny FrisellaP
17BaltimoreEric Soderholm3B17BaltimoreRich AuerbachSS
18Kansas CityEnzo Hernandezss18Kansas CityLuiz MelendezCF
19Los AngelesMickey Riverscf19Los AngelesFred KendallC

Round 11 & 12

Pick # TeamPlayerPositionPick #TeamPlayerPosition
1Montreal Terry HumpfreyC1MontrealMilt Mayc
2PittsburghDave Leonard P2PittsburghSonny JacksonSS
3Cincinnati John Ellis C3CincinnatiAl FitzmorrisP
4New York (AL)Bill Melton3B4New York (AL)Wayne SimpsonP
5ClevelandHal King1B5ClevelandTom MurphyP
6MinnesotaRon Bloomberg1B6MinnesotaJim NorthrupOF
7MilwaukeeGeorge StoneP7MilwaukeeGary WaslewskiP
8BostonDon BufordOF8BostonGil Garrido2B
9 PhiladelphiaPat Corralesc9PhiladelphiaTony OlivaOF
10WashingtonEd FarmerP10WashingtonJohn LowenstienOF
11CaliforniaBill Plumberc11CaliforniaMike HedlundP
12AtlantaFrank RebergerP12AtlantaJerry MosesC
13OaklandDuke SimsC13OaklandJim StrictlandP
14New York (NL)Ray SadeckiP14New York (NL)Bill WilsonP
15Chicago (NL)Felipe Alou1B15Chicago (NL)Sam McDowellP
16BaltimoreBob MillerP16BaltimoreBen OgliveOF
17Kansas CityMike Andrews2B17Kansas CityDave Campbell3B
18Los AngelesGary GentryP18Los AngelesAl Gallagher3b

Round 13 & 14

Pick # TeamPlayerPositionPick #TeamPlayerPosition
1Montreal Earl StephensonP1MontrealWillie HortonOF
2PittsburghCurt Blefary C2PittsburghJoe LahaudOF
3Cincinnati Steve Mingori P3CincinnatiMike KilkennyP
4New York (AL)Dal MaxvillSS4New York (AL)Oscar GambleRF
5ClevelandBilly ConigliaroOF
6MinnesotaEd Spiezio3B5MinnesotaBuzz CapraP
7BostonRick MillerOF6BostonBrock DavisOF
8PhiladelphiaBill ButlerP7PhilladelphiaDan McGinnP
9WashingtonFrank Howard1B8Washington
10CaliforniaRusty TorresRF9CaliforniaTed Kubick2B
11AtlantaTim Cullen2B10AtlantaKen ReynoldsP
12OaklandCecil UpshawP11OaklandEd Goodwin1B
15New York (NL)Pat JarvisP12New York (NL)Eddie LeonSS
16Chicago (NL)Ray CulpP13Chicago (NL)John StephensonC
17BaltimoreFred SchermanP14BaltimoreJim RayP
18Kansas CityBill GreifP15Kansas CityKen SwarezC
19Los AngelesMarty PerezSS16Los Angeles

Round 15 & 16

Pick # TeamPlayerPositionPick #TeamPlayerPosition
1MontrealOrlando Cepeda1B1MontrealNorm AngliniP
2PittsburghJoe NiekroP2PittsburghJuan PizzaroP
3CincinnatiRickey ClarkP
4New York (AL)Phil Roofc3New York (AL)George Hendrickcf
5MinnesotaDwayne AndersonInf4MinnesotaLarry Bitnerof
6BostonJoe Pepitone1B5BostonJerry McNertleyc
7WashingtonChuck TaylorP6WashingtonBobby Knoop2B
8CaliforniaMike StrahlerP7CaliforniaChris ShortP
9AtlantaCleon JonesOF8AtlantaVince ColbertP
10OaklandIke BrownInf9OaklandKen TatumP
11New York (NL)Joe Hague1B10New York (NL)Steve Bryeof
12Chicago (NL)Moe DrabowskyP11Chicago (NL)Mike Ryanc
13BaltimoreJeff Torborgc12BaltimoreBernie Allen3B
14Kansas CityAlan FosterP13Kansas CityMike Hegan1B
15Los AngelesKen WrightP14Los AngelesWalt WilliamsOF

Round 17 & 18

Pick # TeamPlayerPositionPick #TeamPlayerPosition
1MontrealHal Lanier3B1MontrealGates BrownOF
2PittsburghLloyd AllenP2PittsburghCoco Laboy3B
3BostonAl SeverinsenP3BostonTommy MooreP
4CaliforniaBob Bartonc4CaliforniaTom PhobousP
5AtlantaDon CarrithersP5AtlantaOscar BrownOF
6OaklandDick Green2B6OaklandDanny Cater1B
7New York (N)Joe Lis1B7New York (N)Don Minchner1B
8Chicago (N)Tom DukesP8Chicago (N)Lowell PalmerP
9BaltimoreRoger FreedOF9BaltimoreClyde MashoreOF
10Kansas CityJim Spencer1B10Kansas CityJohnny JeterOF
11Los AngelesAlex JohnsonOF11Los AngelesJackie HernandezSS

Round 19 & 20

Pick # TeamPlayerPositionPick #TeamPlayerPosition
1MontrealBuddy BradfordOF
2PittsburghJerry Jeneskip
5CaliforniaMike McQueenP1CaliforniaRon SwabotaOF
6AtlantaMike CosgroveP2AtlantaRich MoralasSS
7New York (N)Ron PerranoskiP3New York (N)Ed AscostaP
8Chicago (N)Jerry KenneySS4Chicago (N)Steve HamiltonP
9BaltimoreJim HardinP5BaltimoreJohn KennedySS
10Kansas CityPaul Popovich2B6Kansas CityJohnny Grubbcf
11Los AngelesBilly ChampionP7Los AngelesBart JohnsonP

Round 21 & 22

Pick # TeamPlayerPositionPick #TeamPlayerPosition
1AtlantaJohn BatemanC1AtlantaRich Reese1B
2New York (N)Steve HovleyOF2New York (N)Dwayne Josephson1b
3Chicago (N)Terry CrowleyOF
4BaltimoreJimmy Stewart1b3BaltimoreDon Clendenon1B
5Kansas CityChris Canazarioc4Kansas CityBrent StormP
6Los AngelesJim YorkP5Los AngelesEd SpragueP

Round 23 & 24

Pick # TeamPlayerPositionPick #TeamPlayerPosition
1New York (N)Bobby FloydP1New York (N)Hoyt WilhelmP
2BaltimoreCasey CoxP
3Kansas CityJesus Alou1B2Kansas CityJoe HornerP

Round 25 & 26

Pick # TeamPlayerPositionPick #TeamPlayerPosition
1New York (N)Jim HoltOF1New York (N)Hal Breeden1B
3Kansas City Tom BurgermeierP

Round 27

Pick # TeamPlayerPosition
1New York (N)Bob MontgomeryC

Resume bullets for the stay-at-home mother

Re-entering the workplace after being a stay-at-home mother has to suck. It used to be considered a noble and honorable thing to take care of small children. Heck, it used to be considered a profession that would normally pay on the order of $100K-$120K a year. When you think about it, a stay-at-home mother is balancing checkbooks, cooking meals, taking care of sick children, constantly doing laundry and sanitizing her home (young children are terrible spreaders of disease), and increasingly home-schooling children while driving them to various activities.

Yet most employers look at the “break in resume” as a negative, and don’t view stay-at-home mothers as doing any work. Then again, most of these people probably forget to thank their mothers on Mothers Day, so perhaps I shouldn’t be surprised. My wife recently re-entered the workplace, and although she is working from home (and we still have a 2 year old), it was a challenge to find an employer that didn’t look down on her decision to care more about her children and husband then a career.

In honor of her decision, and given the increasing desire to hire older workers over younger workers, I asked Microsoft CoPilot to build some resume bullets for a stay-at-home mom re-entering the workplace, and I got these:

  1. Multitasking & Time Management: Successfully managed a busy family schedule, including educational activities, sports commitments, and doctor appointments, while maintaining a clean and organized home.
  2. Budgeting & Financial Planning: Effectively managed household budget, making strategic decisions to ensure financial stability and meet long-term family goals.
  3. Conflict Resolution & Problem Solving: Developed strong problem-solving skills through mediating sibling disputes and addressing unexpected household issues.
  4. Communication & Interpersonal Skills: Fostered an open and supportive family environment that encouraged open communication, emotional support, and mutual respect.
  5. Project Management: Led and executed various projects, such as planning family events and home improvement tasks, demonstrating strong organizational and leadership skills.

Not bad CoPilot, but I think I can do better:

  1. Professional chauffeur. Successfully balanced the extracurricular needs of five individuals whose activities are always located during rush hour traffic and at opposite ends of the city. Managed to avoid accidents, get children to places on time and yet still get dinner on the table.
  2. Skilled negotiator. Can successfully argue with children from 2 to 18 years old, providing persuasive arguments in the wide spectrum of age ranges. Able to bribe without being discovered by peers.
  3. Outstanding Communicator. Able to switch seamlessly between soothing words needed to calm a 4 year old to the angry words needed to vivisect a school administrator that decided pornographic books are a great idea in school libraries. Utilizes full volume range, from sweet whispers to banshee-level screaming to prevent small children from playing in traffic.
  4. Multitasking Momma. Can you take a shower, get dressed and put on makeup, balance a checkbook, take out the garbage cans, make four lunches and boot a cantankerous teenager out the door to school, all before 7 AM and without the luxury of coffee?
  5. Long Range Planner. Provided life guidance to children otherwise lost in the world. Able to keep a husband motivated despite a soul sucking job that cares little of him. Builds her own world that might look messy on the outside, but has more love and charisma then any corporate party.

Given that the next generation seems to whine about showing up on time, putting on real clothes (no, pajamas at your job interview don’t count), and can’t think out more than 2 days…I’ll take a stay-at-home mom as an employee over a whiny 20-something any day.

This post represents the views of the author and not those of the Department of Defense, Department of the Navy, or any other government agency.

Service members are treated as medical expenses

Not a week goes by without someone remarking that I must be lucky to have military medical insurance. A few years ago I would agree that military health care, despite the ups and downs, was actually not too bad. I’ve had surgery, preventative and acute care, and almost all the time it was decent.

The Military Sealift Command hospital ship USNS Comfort (T-AH 20) makes her way through the Panama Canal to cross into the Pacific Ocean on June 3, 2009. The Comfort is participating in Continuing Promise 2009, a four-month humanitarian and civic assistance mission providing medical and other services in seven countries throughout Latin America. DoD photo by the U.S. Navy. (Released)

That’s not true anymore. It’s now taking months to schedule an appointment. I called in January and was given first availability in April. The visits I have had recently are rushed, and I notice more doctors being borrowed between facilities to make appointments happen. Increasingly, I have to seek care at facilities more than an hour’s drive from my home.

What happened? Well, to put it bluntly, the military decided that health care is an expense, not an investment. Last year the services combined all military health records and scheduling into one system called MHS Genesis. This in itself is a good thing, since it means if I seek care at an Air Force hospital, they can get my records electronically without me having to bring physical records along from a Navy hospital

But someone used the merger to lay off thousands of employees. From the perspective of a twidget sitting behind a desk, heath care is an expense. You do everything in your power to minimize expenses, including firing people, shuttering facilities and offering less services in the pursuit of “finding efficiencies.” I’m sure it padded someone’s pockets, but it’s now resulting in less and less health care.

I’ll use myself as an example. I need a routine surgery. Normally it takes 2-4 weeks to schedule. Right now I’m looking at summer time at the earliest, because the USNS COMFORT is deploying, and when she deploys, they empty the nearby Naval hospitals of doctors to go underway. Great for Central America, terrible for our own military members.

Gee, the US government caring more about foreign citizens than their own people? Where have I seen that before?

If you need mental health appointments, better schedule a month out. While there are lots of suicide resources available on the spot, they are almost all over the phone and haven’t made a dent in suicide rates:

“Active Component suicide rates have gradually increased since 2011.  While the 2022 Active Component rate is slightly higher (3%) than 2021, both years remain lower than 2020.” -Department of Defense Releases Annual Report on Suicide in the Military: Calendar Year 2022

Surprising no one, the military’s solution to lack of care is…bring more dependents into military health care?

Seriously, I’m not joking, read about it here.

Hicks laid out a plan to grow the number of patients who receive care in a military treatment facility by 7% by the end of 2026, compared to the number of beneficiaries in December 2022. That would mean 3.3 million people would be using the MTFs in three years, according to Military Times calculations.

So let me get this straight. You can’t see patients in a timely fashion now. You “right sized” health care so that it barely gets by. You prioritized treating foreign citizens over your own. You did one thing right, which was move dependents out into civilian care so they can get treated and not suffer. And instead of hiring more people, or changing how you man the USNS COMFORT, or any number of ways to address the inability to provide health care, you want to bring on MORE patients into an already stressed system?

This makes no sense except in one case: financial. In the FY2024 request for funding, there is this section:

Controlling Health Care Costs
DOD’s budget request noted that private sector care accounted for 65% of the total care delivered to
beneficiaries and that it “will continue to represent an important part of the overall health system in [FY2024] and beyond.” DOD did not state a long-term strategy to control these health care costs while sustaining military medical readiness requirements and other health-related program investments.

So well over half of military health care is delivered by the private sector. Literally, the military couldn’t make it work if it tried. But that’s expensive, and in typical fashion, the military thinks it can do it cheaper, despite not having a great track record in doing so.

Treating health care as an expense, rather than a mission enabler, means we’ll never get the surge capacity needed to deal with wartime injuries and never get appointment scheduling to a reasonable level. This limits the use of Tricare as a recruiting and retention tool, and will exacerbate an already difficult recruiting problem. It’ll force more people, including myself, to pay out of pocket for care we were promised when we first signed up. And for some reason, the military wants to shoot itself in the foot over this.

I don’t recommend it…I heard gunshot wounds take 4-6 weeks to schedule an initial appointment.

This post represents the views of the author and not those of the Department of Defense, Department of the Navy, or any other government agency.

The future is cheap drones

With all the dumb headlines and conspiracy theories surrounding Taylor Swift, you could be forgiven for missing a far more important headline: that the Ukrainians sank the Russian corvette Ivanovets using unmanned surface vessels.

The Ukrainians continue to use cheap drones to hit Russian troops on land and now attack vessels at sea. When you lack the money and infrastructure to build high end tanks, aircraft and ships, and you have to counter such units, cheap drones are going to be the best selection.

Right now we’re seeing wave attacks of guided drones, which require a human in the loop. This will last until electronic weapons become good enough that having a command link to guide the drones becomes too big of a risk. At that point we’re going to start seeing autonomous drones launched on one-way missions that will strike targets without ever calling back to home.

This isn’t to say that drones make ships, aircraft and troops obsolete. Drones can’t occupy land (at least, not until Skynet has its way) and they can’t run airports and seaports. Drones will act as a way of denying the use of these facilities, sea lanes or land. The opposing side will have to develop cheap ways of responding, because its not economically feasible to use a million dollar missile to shoot down a $10K drone every time you are attacked. The United States would do well to develop these methods now before we have to develop them in a hurry in the Red Sea.

This post represents the views of the author and not those of the Department of Defense, Department of the Navy, or any other government agency.

Empty New Year’s Resolutions from the Navy

Plenty of people make New Years Resolutions. Plenty of those have been broken by this time already. It seems the Navy wants to engage in that silliness too. Check out NAVADMIN 003/24, titled America’s Warfighting Navy. Sounds cool right? Well, let’s take a look.

1. Who We Are. We are the United States Navy, the most powerful navy in 
the world. We are the Sailors and Civilians who have answered our Nations
call to service. We are Americans who embody character, competence, and
dedication to our mission. Our identity is forged by the sea and we serve
with honor, courage, and commitment.
2. What We Do. We are here to preserve the peace, respond in crisis, and win 
decisively in war. We operate far forward, around the world and around the 
clock, from the seabed to space, in cyberspace, and in the information 
environment to promote our Nations prosperity and security, deter aggression, 
and provide options to our nations leaders. We deliver power for peace, but 
are always postured and ready to fight and win as part of the Joint Force and 
alongside our Allies and partners.
3. Where We Are Going. The threats to our nation and our interests are real 
and growing. The strategic environment has changed; gone are the days of
operating from a maritime sanctuary against competitors who cannot threaten
us. The National Defense Strategy makes clear that we must defend our
homeland, deter strategic attack, deter and be prepared to prevail in
conflict against the Peoples Republic of China, and meet the acute challenge
of an aggressive Russia and other persistent threats. Our adversaries have
designed their militaries to overcome our traditional sources of strength. We
must move rapidly to stay ahead and continuously create warfighting
advantages. We must think, act, and operate differently, leveraging wargaming
and experimentation to integrate conventional capability with hybrid,
unmanned, and disruptive technologies. Tomorrows battlefield will be
incredibly challenging and complex. To win decisively in that environment,
our Sailors must be the best warfighters in the world with the best systems,
weapons, and platforms to ensure we can defeat our adversaries. We will put
more players on the field platforms that are ready with the right
capabilities, weapons and sustainment, and people who are ready with the
right skills, tools, training, and mindset.
4. Our Priorities. We will focus on Warfighting, Warfighters, and the 
Foundation that supports them.
a. Warfighting: Deliver Decisive Combat Power. We will view everything we
do through a warfighting lens to ensure our Navy remains the worlds
preeminent fighting force. We will prioritize the readiness and capabilities
required to fight and win at sea, and the logistics and shore support
required to keep our Navy fit to fight. We recognize that we will never fight alone. We will advance naval integration with the Marine Corps, and synchronize and align our warfighting efforts with the Joint Force. We will design and drive interoperability with our Allies and partners to deliver combined lethality.
   b. Warfighters: Strengthen the Navy Team. We will use the principles of 
mission command to empower leaders at all levels to operate in uncertain, 
complex, and rapidly changing environments, ready to take initiative and bold 
action with confidence. We will build strong warfighting teams, recruiting 
and retaining talented people from across the rich fabric of America. We will 
provide world- class training and education to our Sailors and Civilians, 
honing their skills and giving them every opportunity to succeed. We will 
ensure our quality of service meets the highest standards, and we will look 
after our families and support networks, who enable us to accomplish our 
warfighting mission.
    c. Foundation: Build Trust, Align Resources, Be Ready. We will earn and 
reinforce the trust and confidence of the American People every day. We will
work with Congress to field and maintain the worlds most powerful Navy and
the infrastructure that sustains it. We will team with industry and academia to solve our most pressing challenges. We will cooperate with the interagency to bolster integrated deterrence. We will align what we do ashore with the warfighting needs of our Fleet.
5. Our Charge. America is counting on us to deter aggression, defend our 
national security interests, and preserve our way of life. With the right 
tools, a winning mindset, and the highest levels of integrity, we will 
operate safely as a team to deliver warfighting excellence.

Well…good luck! You certainly have your work cut out for you!

This post represents the views of the author and not those of the Department of Defense, Department of the Navy, or any other government agency.

First Aid vs Fighting Back

To nobody’s huge surprise, “Dr” Fauci revealed that the 6 foot “social distancing” rule was basically made up.

Lest anyone forget, there were plenty of 6-foot Nazis that screamed at you for getting inside the 6 foot distance…unless it was at a BLM riot. People were doing all sorts of logical backflips to justify riots while shutting down church services. I remember having to open church doors and stream service using a cell phone, laptop and projector so the people outside could still attend.

What frickin’ rubbish.

But that’s not the point of this article. During this time thousands of service members were dismissed from service for refusing the vaccine, which we are finding doesn’t work well, and that COVID is going to essentially be like the flu: annoying, even temporarily incapacitating, but not really a threat to young and healthy that (at least now) make up our military force. Most of these were General Discharges, which can negate the amount of VA benefits you receive. Worse still, this was done as businesses were recovering from the shutdown, so many servicemembers and their families suffered through unemployment and underemployment.

Plenty of Republican lawmakers are making it easy for those members to return to service, and most are…not taking it. These same lawmakers are proposing legislation to open VA benefits to these servicemembers and discharge upgrades. I don’t have an issue with any of this, except that this is first aid, and in reality people should be fighting back.

First aid helps people that have been hurt. In this case, servicemembers got screwed out of good jobs, retirement benefits, VA benefits, and all the other things they were promised if they raised their hand to defend our country. Restoring those things will help in the near term, but its not going to repair the long term damage done. Look at how poorly our recruiting efforts are going. More than a few young people watched how a loved one was poorly treated and said “Gee, I’m not signing up for that!”

First aid isn’t enough. People need to fight back.

Every official that pushed this nonsense needs to be punished.

  • Send Fauci to jail. Sounds extreme? The man admitted to spending US money in CHINA developing bioweapons. I see people getting angry over retired service members caught helping the Chinese learn how to land on aircraft carriers. How is this any different?
  • Court martial flag officers that pushed for General Discharges. At least the Navy had the good sense to use Honorable Discharges for most of its folks. Every flag officer that used a General Discharge knew they were screwing people out of benefits, and even late in the game they continued to push for it. Court martial every, single one of them. For the ones already retired, bring them back and charge them, which is still legal (although perhaps bringing back a few admirals and generals will get this thrown out).
  • Fire the civilian leaders that pushed this nonsense. Their zeal and glee in punishing people needs to be matched with stiff fines and jail time.

First aid doesn’t save you when you’re being assaulted. Only fighting back will.

This post represents the views of the author and not those of the Department of Defense, Department of the Navy, or any other government agency.

Navy desperate to keep…everybody!

Over the holiday period I didn’t bother checking the latest NAVADMINs, because spending time with my family was for more important. So when I looked this week, I saw I missed a doozy: the Navy’s message concerning retention boards.

In December the Navy announces its promotion boards, which are in January (for Captains), Feb-March (for Commanders), and April-May (for Lieutenant Commanders). Some years ago the Navy began convening the retention board immediately after these boards to decide the fates of anyone not selected for promotion. The overarching policy of retention boards is a direct measure of the health of the service, and well, the Naval Service is not healthy.

Take a look at NAVADMIN 291/23. I’ll break it down below:

Paragraph 2 states that any Captain (O-6) that has certain AQDs (basically, special training or expertise in a specific area) that relate to Acquistion can stay until 33 years of service. Normally Captains have to retire at 30 years of service. This isn’t a huge surprise, the Navy is in dire need of Acquisition Workforce personnel, so it’ll keep anyone that it can.

LCDRs (O-4s) that twice failed to select for CDR (O-5) will simply be kept until 20 years, when they can retire. They won’t even be considered for retention…it’s assumed. In the past the retention board could be used to shape manpower by removing the bottom performing LCDRs. That is not happening at all now, essentially if you have a pulse and made O-4, you can stay till 20 years.

Let’s say you’re a LCDR that is a flight instructor, chaplain, cyber warfare engineer, foreign area officer, information professional, maritime space officer, medical corps, nurse corps or supply corps. What if you want to stay past 20 years? Well, you can!

URL 1310 aviators with primary AQDs of DIP or DA5/DA7/DB2/DB5/DB6/DD1/DH3/DL3/DS2 (TACAIR), CWE, FAO, IP, and SC officers selected for continuation will be continued for a period of 3 years to 23 YOAS.  CHC, MSO, MC, and NC officers selected for continuation will be continued until the last day of the month in which the officer 
completes 24 YOAS.

That right there is a bad sign. That means we are significantly short in all those areas, and we’re willing to keep people for an additional 3-4 years to cover the gaps.

What about Lieutenants (O-3s)? Typically LTs that are passed over twice for O-4 are sent home at the end of the next fiscal year. The only LTs I’ve seen the Navy hold onto are people that were prior enlisted and needed another year to reach mandatory officer retirement criteria. But now:

Lieutenant (LT)  Aerospace Engineering Duty Officer (AEDO), CHC, CWE, Cryptologic Warfare (CW), Dental Corps (DC), FAO, Intelligence Officer (INTEL), IP, Judge Advocate General's Corps (JAGC), MC, Medical Service Corps (MSC), MSO, NC, and SC will follow the below as applicable:
a. 2XFOS LTs covered in paragraph 4 with less than 18 YOAS and selected
for continuation will be continued for a period of three years, but not
beyond retirement eligibility at 20 YOAS.

FOS stands for “Failure of Selection.”

So now LTs can stay for 20 years until they can retire. I never thought I’d see that, but here we are. Granted, it’s not every officer, but it won’t surprise me if the retention board eligibility expands to include more officer specialties.

I want to remind everyone that this crisis was generated 100% by our own government:

  • We changed the retirement system way back in 2016-2018, which was the number one thing that kept good people in past 5-10 years of service. I predicted this would end badly, by the way.
  • Then we started losing wars, specifically Afghanistan. We drew out of Afghanistan in a horrible way, so everyone that lost limbs or part of their sanity fighting in that war felt betrayed. This in turn made them tell their kids to never join the military.
  • Oh, and we stayed around in Syria so more of our people could die needlessly. Because nothing says we love our Special Forces more than allowing them to die needlessly in a crappy country where we don’t have an exit strategy.
  • THEN, we kicked people out over the COVID vaccine. Instead of handling that crisis with care, we booted people with general discharges. But don’t worry, we’ll invite them back, I’m sure they’ll come in droves!
  • THEN, the Navy played politics and openly told Congress to go f*#! themselves and used OPTAR money to pay for abortion.

NOW, we are SHOCKED! SHOCKED! that we are in a huge recruiting. crisis. I made a prediction back in February that the Navy would use its “BINGO card” to keep people in:

  1. Not kicking people out for physical fitness test failures
  2. Waiving darn near everything, from age to non-violent felonies
  3. Asking people to pretty-please stay around a few more years
  4. Opening OCS and other admissions
  5. Raising bonuses
  6. Make life better for officers
  7. Reduce opportunities to leave early
  8. Op-Hold people

The Navy has in fact done all the things in bold. The only missing one is making life better. Maybe that’s a draw, since if you wanted free time and per diem off to go murder your unborn baby, you can now get it. The only prediction that hasn’t held was that the Navy would remove marijuana from its drug test, although it was totally an option in Congress.

My prediction for 2024: it only gets worse!

  • We’ll relax rules on marijuana, opioids and other drugs
  • Mental health rules will relax
  • Bonuses will be handed out just to get on the bus
  • We’ll create some new ribbon candy to congratulate people on passing boot camp
  • We’ll see Navy advertisements EVERYWHERE, especially on Reddit, YouTube, Amazon Prime and other streaming platforms

None of it will work. When we spend more time focused on renaming the John C Stennis aircraft carrier, continue to allow flag officers to violate rules and get away with it (remember, you can sexually assault people and not go to jail, so long as you’re a 3-star in the Air Force), and continue to allow a broke acquisition system to churn out expensive weapons, we can’t recruit the best people. The best men and women want to join the Navy to fight for their country, with people and leaders they trust and on equipment that works. They want people held accountable for their actions, and they want others to hold them accountable because that’s how they become better.

We’re doing all the wrong things, and I expect 2024 to be another terrible year for military manning.

This post represents the views of the author and not those of the Department of Defense, Department of the Navy, or any other government agency.